Questions For Proponents Of Evolution

QUESTIONS:

1) Where has macroevolution ("Molecules to Man") ever been observed? What's the mechanism for getting new complex organs or systems? What evolutionary process explains butterfly metamorphosis?

2) Where are the billions of transitional fossils that have to exist for evolution to be true? (That's BILLIONS). Why don't we see a reasonable smooth continuum among all living creatures, or in the fossil record, or both?

3) What are the evolutionary ancestors of the insects? On the evolutionary "trees" in the textbooks, what creatures make up the trunk and the branches?

4) What evidence is there that the highly complex information codes in DNA could ever assemble themselves? What about the 4,000 books worth of coded information that are in a tiny part of each of your 100 trillion cells? If astronomers receive a discernible radio signal from some distant galaxy, most people would conclude that it came from an intelligent source. Why then doesn't the vast information sequence in the DNA molecule (of even a bacteria) also imply an intelligent source?

5) How could organs as amazingly complicated as the eye or the ear or the brain of even the tiniest bird ever come about by natural processes? How could a "bacterial motor" evolve, when it is irreducibly complex?

6) Sexual organs are also irreducibly complex (much more complex in the female). How could these "evolve" when a high level of complexity is necessary for them to function in the first place?

7) If the solar system evolved by planets spinning off from the sun, why do three of them spin backwards (one sideways!), denying the law of angular momentum?

8) Why do short term comets (those that go around more frequently, and decay with each pass by the sun) still exist if the solar system is "billions" of years old?

9) Evolutionists believe that the "Big Bang" explosion started the universe. What evidence is there that any explosion has ever created any kind of order, let alone the flawless precision of our solar system?

10) Global flood legends are in the ancient lore of peoples around the world, and many speak of a world-covering deluge in which animals and one man's family are saved in a ship. How are such detailed similarities possible in cultures that were completely isolated from one another, unless the legends were founded on historical fact?

11) How did matter supposedly evolve against the Law of Cause and Effect ("No effect can be greater than it’s cause")?

12) When Radiometric Dating, why do many scientists assume: The amount of original daughter isotope was zero, the decay rate has always been the same, and there was no gain or loss of parent or daughter isotopes through time? Why do assumptions such as these invalidate any date found? Why are very wide-ranging dates often found in the same sample?

13) Name one reasonable evolutionary hypothesis on how the moon got there (one that is consistent with all of the data).

14) The following features on the earth fit the creation/flood origins model well. What non-contradicting evolutionary model fits all of them?
The Grand Canyon; Continental Shelves; Fit of the Continents; Coal & Oil Formations; Frozen Mammoths; Volcanoes & Lava; Metamorphic Rock; Mid-Ocean Ridge; Ocean Trenches; Earthquakes; Glaciers; Major Mountain Ranges; Geothermal Heat & Fossil Graveyards.

15) How could photosynthesis evolve, seeing that plants cannot manufacture their food without it (irreducible complexity)?

16) Seeing how scientific laws are those phenomena which have no observed exceptions, how could macroevolution occur, contrary to the Law of Biogenesis, the Laws of Probability, and the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics?

17) Mutations are 99.95% deleterious to the gene (losing information). The other .05% are neutral. NONE ADD information. How can upward macroevolution occur when the needed increased complexity of information is not available?

18) What is the evolutionary explanation for the origin of: selfless morals, love, guilt, mercy, etc.?

19) A. "Everything came from a First Cause that was intelligent enough and powerful enough to originate it." or... B. "Everything came from nothing, making itself." Which of these statements is more scientifically reasonable?

20) Have you accepted evolutionary teachings because you have thought them through, or because you trusted what "authorities" have said? Why do such a large number of evolutionists disagree with one another over virtually every aspect of evolutionary belief?

21) What practical or tangible benefit can be said to be due to belief in macroevolution?

22) What is the end result of belief in macroevolution?

23) What is the end result of belief in a Creator?

24) What is at risk if you are wrong?

A Biblical Warning:

"Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to your care. Turn away from godless chatter and the opposing ideas of what is falsely called science..." 1 Timothy 6:20-21

Back To Top